Goal setting for entrepreneurial law firms and attorneys
Whether you've recently hung up your shingle or your season's firm owner, setting goals is one of the best things you can do.
“An idiot with a plan can beat a genius without a plan.” - Warren Buffett
Having well-defined goals can:
In this article we’ll provide an overview of the two core methodologies for goal setting: SMART Goals and Objectives and Key Results.
SMART is a framework for creating goals. It stems from the work of Peter Drucker and has been used by thousands of organizations world-wide since it was first introduced in the 1980s.
Unlike other frameworks, SMART is a simple structure that outlines how to create, track, and measure progress.
Source: Fit Small Business
SMART details five things that a goal must fulfill:
Specific. A SMART goal should provide a clear description of what needs to be achieved. It should be clear in scope and define exactly what must be accomplished.
Measurable. To determine when a goal is achieved, it must be measurable. This is where metrics come in. Your goal should be something like “our firm will publish 10 new blog posts this month.”
Achievable. The SMART framework says that a goal must be within the realm of possibility to be actionable. It is important to note that this does NOT mean your goal should be easy. Many high performing teams routinely set moon-shoot goals, and end up getting about 75% - 85% of the way to their goal.
Relevant. The goal must be consistent with your overall organizational strategy.
Time-bound. A time-bound goal must have a start and end date. Otherwise there is no way to measure whether or not it is successful. Many companies set goals on a quarterly basis.
A great OKR consists for two things: an objective and one or more key results.
At Legal.io, we try to imagine that objectives are like a destination. They exist to align the team around where everyone is trying to get to - what the end state looks like.
Objectives should set a clear and inspiring goal, but should not contain data based targets.
Example: Grow our firm-to-firm referral network.
Key results should be measurable campaigns that benchmark progress towards an objective.
They exist to ensure the team is on track to achieve the objective.
Example: Attend 6 networking events this month.
Example: Add 4 new firms to our list of referral partners.
One of the biggest differences between OKRs and SMART Goals is the connection between OKRs and aspirational goal setting.
A major criticism of SMART Goals was that the “A” seemed to place too much emphasis on immediately attainable goals. Teams felt their creativity stifled and weren’t truly pushing the limits of what their teams could accomplish. They were asking “what is reasonable for our team to achieve” instead of “how far can we push our team to go?”
Most management consultants believe that a mix of the two frameworks leads to the highest return for firms and companies. SMART Goals help organizations set OKRs, and OKRs help the entire team set aspirational goals that propel the organization forward.
In-house legal professionals discuss how to recover from burnout after life in BigLaw.
The 2025 Citi Hildebrandt Client Advisory highlights key performance metrics and strategic directions for law firms.
The European Blockchain Services Infrastructure, a project that began in 2018, could position the EU as a leader in blockchain technology.
You can nail that legal interview with a little bit of preparation!
LexisNexis has announced its acquisition of Belgian startup Henchman with the goal being to enhance its AI-powered legal solutions and integrate Henchman's advanced contract drafting capabilities.
A Bloomberg survey highlights the demanding nature of legal work, with lawyers averaging 53-hour weeks and nearly 20% billing over 80 hours in their busiest weeks.
It is no secret that many immigrants are young students seeking to attend the United States’ top universities.
Tesla prepares for its first trials involving fatalities allegedly caused by its Autopilot system. The outcomes could have significant implications for the company, Elon Musk, and the broader landscape of autonomous driving technologies.
Amazon's GC, David Zapolsky, has redistributed some of his duties to Mark Hoffman to streamline his focus on global public policy. Michael Deal has transitioned to AGC for Global Media and Entertainment.