NY lawmakers have passed several measures to protect minors in an increasingly global and complex online environment.
To protect young people from the negatives of social media, New York lawmakers have joined other states like Utah by taking the fight to those in charge, including social media companies like Meta, X, and ByteDance.
On Friday, New York state lawmakers passed legislation to protect minors from the risks associated with social media use. This legislative package included two significant bills: one to prevent social media platforms from exposing minors to "addictive" algorithmic content without parental consent and another to restrict the collection and sale of personal data of underage users.
SAFE for Kids Act
The first bill passed by the New York state lawmakers is the SAFE Act (Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation) for Kids Act. This Act is designed to ensure that the mental health of young social media users is made a priority.
Under the SAFE Act, social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and YouTube will be prohibited from delivering algorithm-driven content to users under 18 without parental consent. The consent previously required was more or less unspecifc, with users easily bypassing the fine print.
The result of this was keeping users engaged on the platform for extended periods, which allegedly causes addiction. The SAFE Act ensures that young users receive a chronological feed from accounts they follow or generally popular content.
One of the strong supporters of the legislation, Governor Kathy Hochul, said, "This is a historic step forward in our efforts to address the youth mental health crisis and create a safer digital environment for young people."
New York Child Data Protection Act
The second bill passed was the New York Child Data Protection Act. This bill addresses privacy concerns for all young users in New York. The bill barres social media platforms from collecting, using, sharing, or selling personal data of anyone under 18 without informed consent.
For users under 13, parental consent is mandatory. Violations of this Act could result in civil damages or penalties of up to $5k per violation. This allows young users control over their data. This bill follows similar regulations passed by states like Utah, Arkansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Texas, and Florida.tional muster and that enforcement would result in irreparable harm to free speech rights.
Industry Reaction and Opposition
While many people agree that protecting young social media users must be a priority for everyone, including the government and social media companies, the response from the tech industry has been mixed.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, acknowledged the responsibility of app stores in this context but did not fully endorse all aspects of the bills.
NetChoice have gone as far as openly condemning the bills. They have described the legislation as an assault on open intent and free speech. NetChoice insists that the new legislative measures push for content censorship behind age restrictions, potentially infringing First Amendment rights.
Other critics of the law, including TechNet, the Chamber of Progress, and The New York Inclusive Internet Coalition, argue that content moderation will have a negative impact. They argue that algorithmic tools are essential for filtering harmful content and that the new laws could lead to unintended consequences, such as prioritizing spam or harmful speech in chronological feeds.
The New York Internet Coalition also points out that the laws could potentially undermine community support of marginalized groups on social media, including LGBTQ+ youth and undocumented immigrants.
What's Next for the New York Social Media Laws?
If these two bills are to be enacted, there is potential for the laws to face significant legal challenges. Aynne Kokas, a Media Studies Professor, stated the bills might struggle with oversight because of the size of some platforms.
This is because of the resource constraint and the number of uses in populous states like New York. Plus, enforcing age verification and data privacy measures poses logistical difficulties. Despite opposition, Governor Hochul is expected to sign these bills into law.
Atiba Adams will join Krispy Kreme as Chief Legal Officer on June 25, 2024, bringing over two decades of legal experience from companies like Mars, Pfizer, and Bausch + Lomb.
Jonathan Leiken Joins Dollar Tree, Inc. as Executive VP, Chief Legal Officer: A seasoned legal expert, Leiken brings over 20 years of experience in corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and commercial litigation to fortify Dollar Tree's leadership team.
ChatGPT is an AI-powered language model produced by OpenAI that was launched in November 2022 and has already gained millions of users. The original objective was for the ChatGPT to support users in their everyday activities like producing workout plans, recipes, and poems, among other personal tasks. However, the use of ChatGPT has expanded to include work-related activities. In this article, we explore how employees are using ChatGPT in their work and the potential risks this practice carries.
Legal teams are grappling with challenging federal regulations and a diverse array of state laws on issues like paid leave and noncompete agreements, creating a complex compliance environment.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
New York State has banned liquidated damages and clawback provisions designed to protect confidentiality.
TikTok reportedly plans to shut its app for U.S. users from January 19, when a federal ban on the social media app could come into effect, unless the Supreme Court halts it.
Antitrust, M&A, litigation, and restructuring drive Big Law's growth engine this year.
General Counsel weigh on on how they manage, delegate, and prioritize tasks in their demanding role.