Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

AI Legal Battles Voice Rights

Recent legal cases, including Scarlett Johansson's accusation against OpenAI and a class action lawsuit against LOVO, highlight the need for legal regulation in voice AI technology.

AI Legal Battles Voice Rights

Recent legal accusations by actress Scarlet Johansson & other voice actors emphasize the need for legal regulation in voice acting.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming how we interact with technology. One area of particular growth is voice technology, with AI-powered voices becoming commonplace in virtual assistants, audiobooks, and even customer service applications. But this progress is accompanied by a growing legal gray area: the unauthorized use of a person's voice in AI.

The legal issues surrounding voice in AI are multifaceted. Copyright law plays a role, but often the more relevant concern is the Right of Publicity. This protects an individual's control over the commercial use of their likeness, including their voice.

Recent Legal Battles

The legal battles surrounding voice in AI are only just beginning. Two cases highlight the complexities:

Scarlett Johansson vs. OpenAI

Scarlett Johansson accused OpenAI of creating an AI voice for ChatGPT that sounded eerily similar to her. “When I heard the released demo, I was shocked, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so eerily similar to mine,” Johansson said. OpenAI later apologized and paused the voice mode named “Sky.” 

The controversy highlights the need to avoid deliberate mimicry of celebrity voices. While OpenAI’s intentions were not malicious, it underscores the importance of transparency and consent when using AI-generated voices.

LOVO’s Class Action Lawsuit

Voiceover actors Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage filed a class action lawsuit against AI startup LOVO. They claim LOVO misappropriated their voices and those of other celebrities, including Johansson, Ariana Grande, and Conan O’Brien. This case emphasizes the legal risks associated with using AI voices without proper authorization.

“LOVO purports to compensate voice actors,” Pollock Cohen attorneys Steve Cohen and Anna Menkova wrote in the complaint. “That may be true in some cases. But plaintiffs and other members of the class have received no revenue from the continued unauthorized use of their voices by LOVO and LOVO clients.”

Legal Issues Surrounding AI Voice Technology

Some of the key legal issues surrounding AI voice technology include:

Rights of Publicity

Performers have rights to their names, voices, and likenesses. These “rights of publicity” extend even post-mortem in many U.S. states, including New York. Unauthorized use of a performer’s voice could infringe on these rights. When an AI generates a voice that closely resembles a celebrity, it raises questions about whether the AI is exploiting their likeness without permission.

Consumer Protection Laws

Misleading advertising and “passing off” (presenting something as another) can lead to legal action. AI-generated voices must not deceive consumers or misrepresent products or services. For example, if an AI voice is used in a commercial without proper disclosure, it could violate consumer protection laws.

Guild and Union Agreements

Contracts between performers and studios often govern voice performances. These agreements outline compensation, exclusivity, and other terms. When AI-generated voices are used, studios and developers must consider whether they comply with existing contracts. If an AI voice mimics a unionized actor’s voice, it could lead to disputes.

The Future of Voice and the Law

These cases underscore the need for clearer legal frameworks surrounding voice use in AI. Some proposed solutions include:

  • "Right of Voice" Legislation: Several US states are considering legislation that would grant individuals a specific "Right of Voice" alongside the Right of Publicity.

  • Transparency and Disclosure: Requiring developers to be transparent about AI-generated voices and obtain proper licensing could be a step forward.

The unauthorized use of voice in AI presents a complex legal challenge. As AI technology continues to evolve, so too must the laws governing its use. By ensuring robust legal frameworks that protect individual rights while fostering innovation, we can navigate this uncharted territory and ensure the ethical development of voice AI.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

June 3, 2023 Edition #161

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech

June 3, 2023 Edition #161
Newsletter
The Law Schools Overperforming and Underperforming Bar Passage

Bar passage rates are considered better measures of the quality of legal education than graduation or employment rates.

The Law Schools Overperforming and Underperforming Bar Passage
TechnologyCareer
U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Corporate Transparency Law Pending Review

Millions of corporate entities will not have to share information about their owners with the Treasury Department after an appeals court paused enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act that would have required them to do so by Jan. 1.

Inside the Surge: The Booming In-House Counsel Landscape in the U.S.

The U.S. in-house counsel population has surged to 140,800 in 2023, reflecting an 80% increase in 5 years and underscoring the growing importance of in-house legal departments.

Inside the Surge: The Booming In-House Counsel Landscape in the U.S.
Embracing AI in Legal Departments: A Guide to Successful Integration

In legal operations, it's become imperative to figure out the best way to successfully integrate AI tools.

Embracing AI in Legal Departments: A Guide to Successful Integration
Legal OperationsTechnologyIn-House Counsel
Legal.io Newsletter - May 20, 2022

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Legal.io Newsletter - May 20, 2022
Legal OperationsTechnologyIn-House Counsel
Intermittent Employees and I-9 Issues

Occasionally, a company requires an intermittent employee to complete a certain project or goal.

Intermittent Employees and I-9 Issues
Immigration
California ‘BitLicense’ Bill Signed by Gov. Newsom

The bill will impose more stringent audit requirements on cryptocurrency firms.

California ‘BitLicense’ Bill Signed by Gov. Newsom
TechnologyBanking and FinanceBusiness and Corporate
Facebook's $725M Privacy Settlement Sees Record 17 Million Claims

This is the highest number of claims ever submitted in a class action.

Facebook's $725M Privacy Settlement Sees Record 17 Million Claims
TechnologyGovernmentPrivacy
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments