SolutionsHire top legal talent for any scope of workGet Started Contact us to find the best fit for any in-house or law firm role Testimonials Trusted by the world's leading legal departments FAQ Frequently asked questions about working with Legal.ioEmployer Resources Tools and guides for hiring managers The FTC has issued a rule banning non-compete clauses, aiming to remove restrictions that prevent employees from switching jobs within an industry.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a decision this week that could significantly impact the American labor market. On Tuesday, April 23, 2024, the FTC voted on a final rule that would lift restrictions on workers from switching jobs within an industry. This rule, which effectively bans non-compete clauses, has been met with resistance from the Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, which has vowed to immediately challenge the rule in court.
The Non-Compete Ban Prohibiting Their Use
Non-compete clauses are contractual agreements that prevent employees from working for a competitor or starting a similar business for a certain period after leaving their current employer. The FTC’s rule generally prohibits employers from using non-compete clauses. This includes independent contractors and anyone who works for an employer, whether paid or unpaid. The rule will also require employers to rescind existing non-competes and actively inform workers that they are no longer in effect.
The FTC has argued non-compete clauses unfairly block workers from switching jobs and undermine labor competition. They are seen as a widespread and often exploitative practice that suppresses wages, hampers innovation, and blocks entrepreneurs from starting new businesses. The proposed final rule being considered would generally prevent most employers from using noncompete clauses.
The Chamber of Commerce’s Opposition to the Ban
The Chamber of Commerce has expressed its opposition to the ban, arguing that it’s overly broad and limits the ability of companies to protect confidential information. In a call with reporters, the Chamber’s Chief Policy Officer, Neil Bradley, said the FTC doesn’t have the authority to issue the rule. He argued that the rule “opens up a Pandora’s box where this commission or future commissions could be literally micromanaging every aspect of the economy.”
The Legal Showdown
The high-stakes legal showdown comes three years after President Biden signed an executive order encouraging the FTC to limit non-compete agreements, which affect roughly one in five Americans. The Chamber of Commerce plans to sue over the rule as soon as Wednesday. The meeting marks the first occasion that the FTC’s five members have met publicly since Republicans Melissa Holyoak and Andrew Ferguson joined the agency following their confirmation last month.
The outcome of this ruling and the ensuing legal battle could have far-reaching implications for workers and employers alike.
In a recent Womble Bond Dickinson article, Tom Stephenson, VP of Community & Legal Operations at Legal.io, along with other esteemed legal operations leaders, explored the rapid evolution of legal ops and its significant implications for the law departments of the future. At Legal.io, we are committed to be at the forefront of this transformation. Let's embrace the future together.
Large group lateral hires offer law firms a stable, cohesive growth strategy, balancing individual moves and full acquisitions.
Big Law firms anticipate more work in capital markets and cryptocurrency as the new U.S. administration shifts SEC priorities and eases regulations.
In-house legal professionals discuss their experience working remotely.
In recent years, the legal industry has faced significant challenges, and the COVID-19 pandemic has only accelerated the need for firms to adapt to new market realities. One such challenge is the slowdown in transactional practices, leading to a decline in demand for legal services. As a result, law firms have dialed back their summer associate hiring in 2022, with a nearly 2% decline in offers extended to second-year law students hoping to land temporary jobs this summer.
In-house legal professionals talk about their experience with quality of life in in-house positions with BigCorp vs. smaller companies.
The US DOJ and FTC reportedly agreed to divide responsibility for investigating Nvidia, Microsoft and OpenAI, the three major players in the artificial intelligence industry.
Marie Lewis takes on key role at BioMed Realty.
Asking for a promotion is no easy task. You might be struggling to find the right moment, and you might be worried that you’ll come across as arrogant or self-serving. But if you’re looking to get ahead in your career, then you’re going to need to be able to ask for what you want. After all, not everybody wants to get to the top of their organization. You may well be eager to advance; but many people are happy remaining at the level they’re at, perhaps being unwilling to take on extra responsibility leading to more time in the office making difficult decisions. And that’s absolutely fine - everybody is different. The point is that it’s not necessarily going to be obvious to your company’s senior staff that you are looking for that promotion. So if you don’t communicate your ambitions, the powers that be won’t necessarily assume they exist. Okay – so you know that you need to ask. But how to do it? Let’s consider some ideas.
