Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Google Loses Antitrust Fight With Fortnite Maker Over App Store 

A landmark ruling could reshape the mobile app landscape.

Google Loses Antitrust Fight With Fortnite Maker Over App Store 

In a major blow to its app store dominance, Google has lost a critical antitrust lawsuit brought by Epic Games, the maker of the popular video game Fortnite. A jury in California found that Google's Play Store violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly and engaging in anticompetitive conduct. This landmark ruling could have significant implications for the entire mobile app ecosystem.

The Case Against Google

Epic Games filed the lawsuit in 2020, alleging that Google used its control over the Play Store to stifle competition and extract excessive fees from app developers. The company specifically challenged Google's requirement that all apps distributed through the Play Store must use its own billing system, which charges a commission of up to 30% on in-app purchases.

Epic argued that Google's practices harmed consumers by limiting their choices and inflating app prices. The company also claimed that Google's behavior was unfair to developers, who were forced to pay inflated fees and faced restrictions on how they could reach users.

The Jury's Verdict

After a month-long trial, the jury found in favor of Epic Games on all counts. The jury concluded that Google's Play Store constituted a monopoly in the market for Android app distribution and that the company had engaged in anticompetitive conduct. The jury also found that Google's conduct had harmed both consumers and developers.

Epic posted on its company blog saying, “Today’s verdict is a win for all app developers and consumers around the world. It proves that Google’s app store practices are illegal and they abuse their monopoly to extract exorbitant fees, stifle competition and reduce innovation.”

Potential Impact of the Ruling

The ruling could have a significant impact on the mobile app market. Google may be forced to change its Play Store policies, such as allowing developers to use alternative billing systems and reducing its commission fees. This could lead to lower app prices for consumers and more choices for developers.

The ruling could also have broader implications for the tech industry. It could embolden other companies to challenge the dominance of big tech giants like Google and Apple. It could also lead to increased scrutiny of app store practices and other anticompetitive behavior in the digital economy.

Google's Response

Google has said that it plans to appeal the ruling. The company argues that its Play Store policies are necessary to protect users and developers from malware and other security threats. Google also claims that its fees are reasonable and that they help to fund the development and maintenance of the Play Store.

The Road Ahead

It is too early to say what the long-term impact of this ruling will be. However, it is clear that Google's dominance in the mobile app market is no longer unchallenged. The Epic Games lawsuit has opened the door for increased competition and innovation in the mobile app space.

In addition to the potential impact on the mobile app market, the ruling could also have broader implications for the tech industry. It could embolden other companies to challenge the dominance of big tech giants like Google and Apple. It could also lead to increased scrutiny of app store practices and other anticompetitive behavior in the digital economy.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

Four Practices to Power Big Law Growth in 2024

Antitrust, M&A, litigation, and restructuring drive Big Law's growth engine this year.

Four Practices to Power Big Law Growth in 2024
Antitrust and Trade RegulationGovernmentLitigation
Skilled Workers and Professionals – The EB-3 Visa

This will be the final part in the survey of the EB visas, as we have already covered the EB-5 visa and the EB-4 visa is too specific to talk about generally.

Skilled Workers and Professionals – The EB-3 Visa
Immigration
ABA Proposed Accreditation of Online Law Schools Garners Widespread Support

The American Bar Association's proposal to accredit fully online law schools reflects a significant shift in legal education, embracing technology and broader access.

ABA Proposed Accreditation of Online Law Schools Garners Widespread Support
CareerEducation
Legal.io Webinar Series: Atlassian's AI-Driven Legal Approach

In our recent webinar, distinguished legal trailblazers convened to delve into the various routes leading to leadership positions in legal operations. This enlightening session empowered participants with crucial tools, strategies, and perspectives to unleash their leadership capabilities and thrive within corporate in-house legal departments.

Legal.io Webinar Series: Atlassian's AI-Driven Legal Approach
Legal Operations
StructureFlow Secures $6M in Series A Funding to Enhance Legal Data Visualization

UK-based legal tech company StructureFlow has raised $6 million in Series A funding to advance its AI-driven visual representation tools for legal professionals.

Technology
California Extends Data Privacy Protections to Brain Waves with SB 1223

California has become the second state after Colorado to extend data privacy protections to brain waves after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law SB 1223, amending the CCPA to define neural data as persona-sensitive information, effective immediately.

Privacy
U.S. Judiciary Considers Ethical Overhaul in Law Clerk Hiring

The U.S. judiciary is addressing ethical concerns in law clerk hiring, prompted by recent incidents and complaints of bias and favoritism.

U.S. Judiciary Considers Ethical Overhaul in Law Clerk Hiring
HiringGovernment
Community Perspectives: Do you have to have experience in BigLaw in order to get a chance at an in-house position?

Our in-house professional community discuss their views on how legal departments weigh your BigLaw experience.

Community Perspectives: Do you have to have experience in BigLaw in order to get a chance at an in-house position?
In-House CounselLaw FirmsCareer
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments