Law firms pledge inclusivity as “21% of the workforce identifies as having a disability, but only 1.4% of lawyers do.”
Over 90 law firms have pledged their commitment to creating a more inclusive profession for lawyers with disabilities. This initiative marks a significant step towards ensuring equal opportunities and fostering diversity in the legal field.
The participating law firms have collectively pledged to take proactive steps to create a more inclusive environment for lawyers with disabilities, such as implementing disability-friendly policies, providing necessary accommodations, and promoting awareness about disability inclusion within their organizations.
The initiative for companies to focus on disability inclusion stems from the Mansfield Rule’s primary objective of tackling the underrepresentation of disabled lawyers in the legal field, according to Diversity Lab CEO Caren Ulrich Stacy in a discussion.
“Twenty-one percent of the workforce identifies as having a disability, but only 1.4% of lawyers do,” Ulrich Stacy said. “Maybe it’s because we haven’t created a culture of inclusivity, so people are not identifying as having a disability—we want to change that dynamic. We want people to feel valued and seen in the same way as everyone else and have equal access to opportunities.”
The Need for Inclusion
The legal profession has long been criticized for its lack of diversity and inclusivity. Lawyers with disabilities often face numerous challenges, including physical barriers, attitudinal biases, and a lack of understanding about their capabilities. This initiative aims to address these issues and create a more inclusive and supportive environment for all lawyers.
That goal is contingent on creating a more inclusive environment that allows attorneys to feel comfortable identifying their disabilities to their firms, however. “Until we create a culture of inclusivity, lawyers are not going to want to be visible as having a disability until they feel accepted,” Ulrich Stacy said.
Impact on the Legal Profession
This commitment by over 90 law firms is expected to have a profound impact on the legal profession. It sends a strong message to the industry about the importance of diversity and inclusion. Moreover, it sets a precedent for other firms and legal institutions to follow, potentially leading to widespread changes in the industry.
Moving Forward
While this pledge is a significant step forward, it is just the beginning. The participating law firms must now follow through on their commitments and implement the necessary changes. Moreover, the legal profession as a whole must continue to strive for inclusivity and diversity, ensuring that all lawyers, regardless of their disabilities, have the opportunity to succeed.
In our recent webinar, distinguished legal trailblazers convened to delve into the various routes leading to leadership positions in legal operations. This enlightening session empowered participants with crucial tools, strategies, and perspectives to unleash their leadership capabilities and thrive within corporate in-house legal departments.
Work-life balancer or career breaker? Slaughter and May's time-off approach formalizes flexibility, addressing concerns surrounding burnout in BigLaw.
General Counsels discuss how they are incorporating ESG policies into their company-wide initiatives.
In-house legal professionals talk about on-the-job in-house knowledge.
The 2023 Legal Department Operations Index found that the industry is facing a technology conundrum, with growing legal tech use but insufficient budgets.
Despite the surge, legal counsel costs overall took up a smaller percentage of companies’ expenses, while in-house lawyers’ duties continued to broaden to reflect the business landscape’s current challenges.
A Bloomberg Law special report indicates that in-house counsel use of artificial intelligence increased five-fold from Spring 2023 to Summer 2023.
In today's digital age, the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats poses significant challenges for organizations striving to maintain robust security. With the advent of AI models, the threat landscape has become more sophisticated, demanding adaptive strategies to safeguard sensitive data and protect against potential breaches. In this blog post, we explore the next generation of cyber threats and offer practical insights on adapting security measures to stay ahead in this dynamic environment.
Opponents say the legislation would violate the First Amendment by allowing the federal government to dictate information and censor protected speech, potentially making the regulatory landscape worse for businesses and consumers.