Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Intel Triumphs in $2.18B VLSI Patent Verdict Appeal

Intel's bid to nullify a patent that constituted $1.5 billion of a $2.18 billion verdict it previously lost to VLSI in 2021 was accepted.

Intel Triumphs in $2.18B VLSI Patent Verdict Appeal

In a significant development that has sent ripples through the technology sector, the U.S. Patent Office tribunal has ruled in favor of Intel Corp, overturning a previous $2.18B verdict against the company in a case involving VLSI Technology LLC. This ruling not only marks a major legal victory for Intel but also brings an end to a high-stakes battle that had cast a shadow over the company’s operations.

The Core of the Dispute

The dispute at the heart of this case involved two patents related to chip-making, which were owned by VLSI Technology LLC. In the initial verdict, the jury sided with VLSI, finding Intel guilty of infringing these patents. As a result, Intel was ordered to pay a hefty sum of $2.18B in damages, a decision that sent shockwaves through the industry.

Intel’s Firm Stance and Appeal

Intel, however, remained steadfast in its disagreement with the jury’s decision. The company expressed its intention to appeal the verdict, maintaining that it had not infringed upon the patents in question. Intel also took this opportunity to call for reforms in the patent litigation system. The company argued that “litigation investors” were exploiting low-quality patents to extract “exorbitant” damages, a practice that, according to Intel, stifles innovation and has detrimental effects on the economy.

In its quest to overturn a patent that accounted for a substantial $1.5B of the $2.18B verdict, Intel took its case to the U.S. Patent Office tribunal. The tribunal’s decision to rule in Intel’s favor has been hailed as a significant victory for the company, potentially setting a precedent for future cases.

The Market’s Reaction

The initial verdict had a noticeable impact on Intel’s market performance, with the company’s shares closing down 2.6% at $61.24. With the latest ruling from the U.S. Patent Office tribunal now public, all eyes are on the market’s reaction. Investors and industry analysts alike are keenly observing the situation, waiting to see how this development will influence Intel’s stock performance.

Impact on Intel’s Operations

With the legal dispute now behind them, Intel can refocus its efforts on its core operations. The ruling could provide a boost to Intel’s reputation and investor confidence, potentially leading to improved market performance. However, the company may also need to reassess its strategies to avoid future patent disputes.

Implications for the Tech Industry

This case serves as a stark reminder of the high stakes involved in patent disputes within the technology sector. It underscores the urgent need for clear, fair, and effective rules to govern patent litigation. Such rules are essential to ensure that the spirit of innovation is not stifled by litigation. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing the course of future patent disputes and shaping the legal landscape of the technology industry.

The Future of Patent Litigation

The Intel vs VLSI case could potentially serve as a turning point in the way patent disputes are handled in the technology sector. The ruling in favor of Intel may discourage “patent trolls” - entities that hold patents with the primary goal of enforcing them against alleged infringers instead of using them to produce goods or services. This could lead to a decrease in the number of frivolous patent lawsuits, allowing tech companies to focus more on innovation and less on legal battles.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

H-1B Visa Alternatives

In 2015, 233,000 applicants competed for the 65,000 H-1B visas available.

H-1B Visa Alternatives
Immigration
Counsel Grapple with Global AI Regulation Challenges

The BRG report reveals a widespread lack of confidence among executives and legal professionals in organizations' ability to comply with current AI regulations.

Counsel Grapple with Global AI Regulation Challenges
TechnologyGovernment
Know Your Options: Inappropriate Job Interview Questions

When interviewing for your dream job, it can feel counterintuitive to not answer every question asked of you. However, some seemingly innocuous questions are actually quite inappropriate (and sometimes illegal) when asked during a job interview. Regardless of intent, here is a guide on how to handle these types of questions.

Know Your Options: Inappropriate Job Interview Questions
CareerMental HealthDiversity and Inclusion
Amazon Legal Department Sees Strategic Shift in Leadership Roles

Amazon's GC, David Zapolsky, has redistributed some of his duties to Mark Hoffman to streamline his focus on global public policy. Michael Deal has transitioned to AGC for Global Media and Entertainment.

CareerGeneral CounselTechnology
Form I-9 Carries Heavy Penalties if Filed Incorrectly

All employers must ensure that Form I-9 is properly filled out for each employee.

Form I-9 Carries Heavy Penalties if Filed Incorrectly
Business and CorporateImmigrationLabor and Employment
Understanding the Executive Order on U.S. Investments in Chinese Technology Sectors

Explore the key aspects of the Biden Administration's recent executive order on U.S. investments in Chinese semiconductor, quantum computing, and AI sectors. This comprehensive guide provides insights for investors, legal professionals, and businesses on the implications, targeted sectors, and potential compliance challenges.

Understanding the Executive Order on U.S. Investments in Chinese Technology Sectors
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments