FTC proposed restrictions would ban Meta from profiting off the data collected from users who are under 18 years old.
In a significant legal development, a U.S. federal judge has ruled against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The ruling allows a U.S. regulator to seek to reduce the amount of money the social media giant makes from users under the age of 18.
The Ruling
The FTC’s proposal comes after an independent assessor found "several gaps and weaknesses in Facebook’s privacy program." The proposed restrictions would ban Meta from profiting off the data collected from users who are under 18 years old. This is the third time the agency has taken action against the company for allegedly violating users’ privacy.
The FTC’s move extends concerns over how the social media giant courts children. Instagram, another Meta company, had been developing a version for kids under 13 until public scrutiny pushed the company to table the project in late 2021. The FTC proposal also seeks to stop the company from releasing new products without approval from the independent privacy assessor and to put limits on the company’s use of facial recognition technology.
Meta’s Response
A spokesperson for Meta said the move was “a political stunt” and that the company had been given no opportunity to respond to the allegations. The spokesperson also criticized the FTC for singling out an American company while allowing Chinese companies, like Tik Tok, to operate without constraint on American soil.
Broader Impact on the Tech Industry
This ruling could set a precedent for other tech companies that rely on user data for revenue. It signals a shift in the regulatory landscape, with authorities showing a greater willingness to impose restrictions on how tech companies can use and monetize user data.
The Global Impact of the Ruling
The EU has led the way when it comes to protecting consumer data privacy and security laws, making the rights and protection of its citizens and their data paramount. The GDPR was the first major privacy statute to be put into place across the globe, something that the U.S. has not yet done. EU privacy regulators have hit major U.S. tech companies with large fines over the last several years in GDPR-related matters.
The ruling against Meta marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over privacy rights and the monetization of user data. It remains to be seen how this will impact Meta’s operations and the wider tech industry. However, it is clear that this decision could herald a new era of increased regulatory scrutiny for tech giants.
U.S. Supreme Court acknowledges that AI transforms the legal landscape, copyright holds sway.
By ruling in favor of Coinbase in a $5 million class action, the Ninth Circuit clarified a recent Supreme Court precedent finding that when a party requests a stay in a dispute subject to arbitration, the district court has no discretion to deny it.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
The Supreme Court appeared skeptical of a pair of laws in Texas and Florida restricting how social media companies and others hosting user-generated content can moderate their sites.
Zoom Video Communications Inc. restructures its in-house legal department, appointing new roles and addressing privacy and security concerns amidst a company-wide downsizing and a significant legal settlement.
Six months after Credit Suisse rescue, investigation continues into its financial health.
Gartner says the increase will be largely driven by the need for assurance leaders needing tools to keep up with the increase in regulatory attention on executive risk oversight and monitoring.
Comprehensive immigration reform is finally underway.
Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency that allows transactions to take place directly between two parties, without the need of a central bank acting as a middle-man. This legal guide explains what Bitcoin is, and covers some of the legal issues facing this new type of currency.