SolutionsHire top legal talent for any scope of workGet Started Contact us to find the best fit for any in-house or law firm role Testimonials Trusted by the world's leading legal departments FAQ Frequently asked questions about working with Legal.ioEmployer Resources Tools and guides for hiring managers Amazon was found to have infringed four voice-recognition patents when it included VoiceBox ’s technology in its Echo smart speakers.
Amazon, the tech giant known for its revolutionary voice assistant, Alexa, has been ordered to pay $46.7 million in damages. A jury in Delaware federal court found that Amazon’s Alexa virtual assistant violates patents related to speech recognition and natural language processing.
The lawsuit was filed by VB Assets, whose predecessor, VoiceBox Technologies, created voice-control software for companies including carmakers Toyota, Chrysler, and Dodge, and GPS makers TomTom and Magellan. VB Assets accused Amazon of copying its innovations and infringing four patents covering advances in voice-based search technology.
According to the lawsuit filed in 2019, VoiceBox representatives first met with Amazon executives in 2011 to discuss integrating its patented technology into Amazon products. However, Amazon launched Alexa in its Echo smart speakers in 2014 and has since integrated the voice assistant into other devices and mobile apps. The lawsuit alleges that Amazon began poaching dozens of VoiceBox employees starting in 2016, and that the two companies met again about VoiceBox’s patents in 2017.
VB Assets claimed in its complaint that Amazon’s conduct “crushed” VoiceBox’s chances to “promote and build a business” around its patents. Amazon’s introduction of its Alexa and Echo products, and its subsequent poaching of dozens of VoiceBox Technologies’ engineers and scientists, had a significant impact on VoiceBox’s business. VoiceBox Technologies was later acquired by software company Nuance Communications in 2018.
The Verdict
The jury determined that Amazon infringed patents belonging to VB Assets. As a result, Amazon was ordered to pay $46.7 million in damages. Representatives for Amazon and VB did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the verdict.
Lessons Learned
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of intellectual property rights and the potential consequences of patent infringement. It also highlights the ongoing legal challenges faced by tech companies in the rapidly evolving field of voice-assistant technology.
Future Implications
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, particularly for companies developing voice-assistant technologies. It underscores the need for these companies to ensure they are not infringing on existing patents, and to respect the intellectual property rights of other firms. This could lead to increased scrutiny of patent portfolios and potentially more litigation in the future.
Last month, an attention-grabbing report by the OECD announced that lawyers were at “high risk” of losing their jobs to artificial intelligence (AI). However, a more nuanced view is suggested by a recent international survey conducted by LexisNexis, titled the“International Legal Generative AI Survey”.
The American Bar Association has released new data on bar passage outcomes for law schools, including pass rates for first-time takers in 2022 and two-year bar passage rates based on 2020 graduates.
Generals Counsel talk about their experience preparing their teams for AI legal and ethical work.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
In-house legal professionals weigh in on their experiences being a GC/AGC.
The legal industry is often cited as ripe for disruption and in the same breath criticized for being slow to embrace change. This guide looks at the implications of blockchain technology for the legal industry.
Legal professionals are becoming increasingly disengaged with their work.
Senator Bernie Sanders has proposed legislation to reduce the workweek to 32 hours, leveraging AI and automation's potential to maintain productivity without reducing wages.
