SolutionsHire top legal talent for any scope of workGet Started Contact us to find the best fit for any in-house or law firm role Testimonials Trusted by the world's leading legal departments FAQ Frequently asked questions about working with Legal.ioEmployer Resources Tools and guides for hiring managers Amazon was found to have infringed four voice-recognition patents when it included VoiceBox ’s technology in its Echo smart speakers.
Amazon, the tech giant known for its revolutionary voice assistant, Alexa, has been ordered to pay $46.7 million in damages. A jury in Delaware federal court found that Amazon’s Alexa virtual assistant violates patents related to speech recognition and natural language processing.
The lawsuit was filed by VB Assets, whose predecessor, VoiceBox Technologies, created voice-control software for companies including carmakers Toyota, Chrysler, and Dodge, and GPS makers TomTom and Magellan. VB Assets accused Amazon of copying its innovations and infringing four patents covering advances in voice-based search technology.
According to the lawsuit filed in 2019, VoiceBox representatives first met with Amazon executives in 2011 to discuss integrating its patented technology into Amazon products. However, Amazon launched Alexa in its Echo smart speakers in 2014 and has since integrated the voice assistant into other devices and mobile apps. The lawsuit alleges that Amazon began poaching dozens of VoiceBox employees starting in 2016, and that the two companies met again about VoiceBox’s patents in 2017.
VB Assets claimed in its complaint that Amazon’s conduct “crushed” VoiceBox’s chances to “promote and build a business” around its patents. Amazon’s introduction of its Alexa and Echo products, and its subsequent poaching of dozens of VoiceBox Technologies’ engineers and scientists, had a significant impact on VoiceBox’s business. VoiceBox Technologies was later acquired by software company Nuance Communications in 2018.
The Verdict
The jury determined that Amazon infringed patents belonging to VB Assets. As a result, Amazon was ordered to pay $46.7 million in damages. Representatives for Amazon and VB did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the verdict.
Lessons Learned
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of intellectual property rights and the potential consequences of patent infringement. It also highlights the ongoing legal challenges faced by tech companies in the rapidly evolving field of voice-assistant technology.
Future Implications
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, particularly for companies developing voice-assistant technologies. It underscores the need for these companies to ensure they are not infringing on existing patents, and to respect the intellectual property rights of other firms. This could lead to increased scrutiny of patent portfolios and potentially more litigation in the future.
Litigation finance has evolved into a $15.2 billion market, with many of the biggest U.S. law firms now leveraging third-party funding to pay the costs of more complex or long-running lawsuits.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
Newly released data by the EEOC shows significant gaps in national median pay between men and women.
Polarization is increasingly fueled by social media and economics.
Ross Intelligence failed to convince a federal judge that Thomson Reuters is forcing people to buy its Westlaw search tools in exchange for access to its caselaw database.
Recently named among top female founders, Hannah Konitshek, Co-Founder and Chief Operating Officer of Legal.io, exemplifies leadership in fostering diversity and inclusion in legal technology.
Employers on both sides of the Atlantic hiring in the EU will need to track and report pay data accurately and ensure compliance with the new transparency requirements.
Our anonymous In-house Fishbowl community members recently discussed the move when transitioning from BigLaw to in-house position without having been in their position for at least five years. Here is a list of the responses from others in the community.
