Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Community Perspectives: Hello! Our legal team is looking to introduce contract review SLA’s depending on type of contract they need legal to review. Does anyone do this?

In-house legal professionals discuss contract review SLA's

Community Perspectives: Hello! Our legal team is looking to introduce contract review SLA’s depending on type of contract they need legal to review.  Does anyone do this?

(Author) Legal Operations Lead

Hello! Our legal team is looking to introduce contract review SLA’s depending on type of contract they need legal to review.  Does anyone do this or is advisable not to have contract SLA’s published externally to business lines? I worry about not meeting the SLA’s since all contracts are slightly different and we have a very small team.  Please let me know you thoughts when you have a second.  Thanks!

 

Legal Operations Reponses:

  • In my experience, if you provide SLAs at all, they should be directed at "first reponses" - i.e., acknowledging receipt of the request. It's best not to commit to SLAs related to actual contract review as there are too many variables at play -- how complex the terms are, whether on your paper or the other parties', how quickly the other party returns responses to you, etc. Finally, there's a potential conflict of interest in pushing the legal team to accelerate reviews purely to close deals.
  • Hi! I would be happy to connect and share my experiences with SLAs and the different ways I’ve used them over the years.
  • In my experience, setting SLAs is difficult because each contract is different - your paper vs. customer paper, type of agreement, etc. Also a lot depends on the engagement of the other party. I don't like to commit to internal SLAs for these reasons. What I've seen in the past is setting an SLA of, say, 2 business days to acknowledge receipt and to provide high level feedback only (i.e. I glanced at this document and the redlines are light, so I will get it back to you by end of week). Just so the business feels acknowledged and you don't get a million pings asking for status (although you probably will anyway)
  • I think complexity definitions rather than SLA’s might help not having a solid turnaround time for the business to understand the turnaround time is, “well it depends” on the type of agreement.  I really appreciate the feedback.

Head of Legal Responses:

  • Here's what we share through our confluence page

Additional Questions

  • Question for the group--do you have a separate SLA for third party paperwork? We have an internal SLA broken down by [Internal] paper and Customer paper.Also, does your company have different internal SLAs for customer contracts v. vendor contracts v. partner contracts?

 

Give us your response and be a part of the discussion.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments