SolutionsHire top legal talent for any scope of workGet Started Contact us to find the best fit for any in-house or law firm role Testimonials Trusted by the world's leading legal departments FAQ Frequently asked questions about working with Legal.ioEmployer Resources Tools and guides for hiring managers The state is considering a Portfolio Bar Exam program in order to increase the diversity of admitted attorneys.
California is considering a new program that would allow law graduates to become licensed attorneys without taking the bar exam. The program, known as the Portfolio Bar Exam, would require graduates to complete a period of supervised practice and submit a portfolio of their legal work for evaluation.
The Portfolio Bar Exam is similar to programs that have already been implemented in a few other states, including Wisconsin and Oregon. The State Bar of California is expected to make a decision about whether to implement the Portfolio Bar Exam in the next few months. If the program is approved, it would likely go into effect in 2025.
Arguments in Favor of the Portfolio Bar Exam
Proponents of the Portfolio Bar Exam argue that it would have a number of benefits. First, they argue that it would make it easier for people from diverse backgrounds to become lawyers. The bar exam has been criticized for being biased against certain groups, such as women and minorities. The Portfolio Bar Exam, on the other hand, would allow law graduates to demonstrate their skills and competence in a more holistic way.
Second, proponents of the Portfolio Bar Exam argue that it would help reduce the cost of legal education. The bar exam is expensive to prepare for, and it can be a barrier of entry for law graduates who are already burdened with student loan debt. The Portfolio Bar Exam, on the other hand, would be less expensive to prepare for, and it would allow law graduates to start practicing law sooner.
Arguments Against the Portfolio Bar Exam
Opponents of the Portfolio Bar Exam argue that it would lower the standards for becoming a lawyer. The bar exam is a standardized test that is designed to assess a law graduate's knowledge of the law and their ability to apply the law to hypothetical fact patterns. The Portfolio Bar Exam, on the other hand, would be subjective and would rely on the judgment of a panel of reviewers.
Opponents of the Portfolio Bar Exam also argue that it would make it more difficult to ensure that all lawyers are competent. The bar exam is a high-stakes test, and it is designed to ensure that all lawyers have a basic level of competence. The Portfolio Bar Exam, on the other hand, would not be as rigorous, and it would be possible for law graduates to be licensed even if they do not have a strong foundation in the law.
Bar Exam Fee Increase
In addition to the possibility of a Portfolio Bar Exam, the cost of taking the California bar exam is also increasing. Starting in February 2024, the exam fee will increase by 26%, from $800 to $1,000. The State Bar of California says that the fee increase is necessary to cover the rising costs of running the exam.
The increase in the bar exam fee is likely to put a financial strain on law graduates, many of whom are already burdened with student loan debt. It could also deter some people from pursuing a legal career.
Implications for the Future of the Legal Profession
The combination of these two developments - the possibility of a Portfolio Bar Exam and the increase in the bar exam fee - has important implications for the future of the legal profession in California and across the country.
If the Portfolio Bar Exam is implemented, it could make it easier for people from diverse backgrounds to become lawyers and could help to reduce the cost of legal education. However, it could also lower the standards for becoming a lawyer.
The increase in the bar exam fee is likely to put a financial strain on law graduates and could deter some people from pursuing a legal career.
It remains to be seen how these developments will play out in the long term and if other states will adopt a similar portfolio exam approach.
WilmerHale has introduced a non-equity partnership tier, aligning with a growing trend among major law firms to offer a two-tier partnership structure. The move will not impact current equity partners.
In-house legal professionals discuss the trajectory of their careers after they made the switch to in-house.
The DOJ and FTC have released a draft to alter the existing Merger Guidelines.
As a hiring manager, you know finding the right person for each position is an arduous task that involves a considerable amount of work even before you post the role. After pinning down the particulars of the role you and your company are looking to fill, the next step is finding the perfect match! Here are a few tasks/mindsets to understand and account for before posting the role.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
US multinationals are restructuring their overseas holdings to bring foreign subsidiary ownership back to the US, delaying the impact of a newly established 15% global minimum tax.
Violation of intellectual property rights, "infringement" with regard to patents, copyright, and trademarks, and "misappropriation" with respect to trade secrets, can be a breach of civil law or criminal law, which depends on the type of intellectual property involved, the jurisdiction, and the nature of the action.
In-house Counsel talk about the salary wars in BigLaw and how that affects them now.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
