Six months after Credit Suisse rescue, investigation continues into its financial health.
U.S. authorities are currently investigating Credit Suisse, a major Swiss bank, over allegations that it misled investors about its financial health prior to a state-backed rescue by UBS. The investigation comes six months after UBS stepped in to salvage its rival in a government-orchestrated rescue.
Credit Suisse has received requests for documents and information from several agencies, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Justice Department, and Swiss regulator FINMA. These requests are part of an effort to assess whether the bank misled investors about its financial health as it teetered towards a state-backed rescue.
Three U.S. class-action lawsuits have also been filed against Credit Suisse, as well as current and former directors, alleging misleading statements about customers withdrawing cash in late 2022. Credit Suisse, which is now part of UBS, is cooperating with the authorities.
The Rescue
UBS swept in to salvage its rival in March after tens of billions of dollars left Credit Suisse amid a crisis of confidence in a market already rattled by a collapse of some regional U.S. lenders. This rescue operation was the biggest banking deal since the global financial crisis and resulted in a lender with a balance sheet of $1.7T.
The Aftermath
The inquiries now highlight a potential risk of fines and penalties for UBS. Credit Suisse was hit by ₣110.5B ($124B) of outflows in the last three months of 2022 which pushed the bank close to the brink. These outflows continued in the first half of 2023.
In the early hours of March 16, 2023, Credit Suisse said it intended to borrow from the SNB through a facility called Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) to “pre-emptively” bolster its cash buffers. However, after Credit Suisse’s reassurances that the ₣50B franc injection would facilitate its turnaround and told staff and clients it remained a viable business, the bank needed more cash and was running out of collateral to pledge at the central bank.
The investigation into Credit Suisse could have far-reaching implications for both the bank itself and the wider banking industry. If found guilty of misleading investors, Credit Suisse could face significant fines and penalties, which could further damage its already fragile financial position.
Moreover, this case could set a precedent for how authorities handle similar situations in the future. It could lead to stricter regulations for banks regarding their disclosure practices, potentially forcing them to be more transparent about their financial health.
The investigation could also impact investor confidence in banks. If investors feel they cannot trust the information provided by banks, they may be less willing to invest in them. This could lead to lower capital levels for banks, making them more vulnerable to financial shocks.
Finally, this case highlights the importance of robust regulatory oversight in maintaining stability in the banking sector. Without effective regulation, banks may engage in risky behavior that could threaten their own survival and potentially destabilize the entire financial system.