Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Google Settles Antitrust Allegations with 50 States over Play Store Practices

Google was accused of monopolistic practices and of inflating prices in the Android app market.

Google Settles Antitrust Allegations with 50 States over Play Store Practices

Google has reached an agreement in principle with U.S. states to settle an antitrust lawsuit for its alleged conduct in the Google Play Store, according to a court filing on Tuesday, September 5. This lawsuit was led by New York Attorney General Letitia James and attorneys general from California, North Carolina, Tennessee and Utah. 

The lawsuit, which accused Google of monopolistic practices, was filed in 2021 and alleged the company inflated prices for paid apps and in-app purchases in the Android app market. Google was also accused of imposing technical barriers for third-party app developers and that it forced app developers and users to use its payment processing service, Google Play Billing, which charges fees as high as 30% per transaction. “Google’s anticompetitive conduct harms consumers and app developers, both at the point of app distribution and when a consumer later purchases in-app digital products,” the original complaint argued in part.

In 2021, Google responded to the lawsuit in a blog post saying, “it’s strange that a group of state attorneys general chose to file a lawsuit attacking a system that provides more openness and choice than others.” Google said it did not have a comment at that time. “No company is too big to play by the rules, including Google. We brought this lawsuit because it is illegal to use monopoly power to drive up prices,” the attorneys general said in a statement.

The decision to settle this case didn’t come with much in the way of information from the parties involved – court documents only state that the agreement had been reached and asked for a future trial date of November 6 to be vacated along with suspension of pre-trial deadlines. On Wednesday, the attorneys general said the Play Store settlement agreement, which will be subject to court approval, has yet to be finalized and more details will be shared publicly in the next 30 days.

If the court doesn’t accept the settlement, “the parties shall be returned to their respective litigation positions” and the trial will go on. No settlement amount was mentioned, and it appears that only “U.S. state and territories as well as the named consumer plaintiffs” are party to the settlement. That means several corporate plaintiffs on the suit, including Epic Games and dating website Match.com, appear to not be giving up the fight. Neither company’s lawyers responded to questions.

The tech giant is battling another closely watched antitrust showdown this month. In mid-September, Google is going to trial against a group of states and the Justice Department alleging the design of its search page has harmed rivals such as Yelp or Expedia.

The Justice Department first sued Google during the Trump administration over its dominance in online search. Another lawsuit was brought by the Biden administration in January, which argues Google’s ad tech business should be broken up

The deal comes a week after the judge in the case retracted the class status granted in the case. Similar to the 2022 Play Store settlement, this latest deal will take another antitrust case off of Google’s several pending cases. It won’t touch the other two that are still on the docket alleging abuses of Google’s search power and advertising arm.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

Sixth Circuit Net Neutrality Case Centers on Major Questions Doctrine

The FCC's net neutrality rules face a major challenge under the Sixth Circuit as debate centers on the major questions doctrine and potential Supreme Court review.

Sixth Circuit Net Neutrality Case Centers on Major Questions Doctrine
Telecommunications
The AI Gold Rush: A Tale of Four States

The current surge in technology, particularly in the field of generative AI, is creating a new kind of gold rush. However, the spoils of this boom are not evenly spread. In fact, they are highly concentrated.

The AI Gold Rush: A Tale of Four States
Newsletter
Preparing for the SEC's Cybersecurity Disclosure Regulations

As the SEC's new cybersecurity-disclosure rules approach implementation on December 18, companies face the challenge of balancing the need for transparency with the risk of exposing sensitive details. The regulations demand prompt reporting of material cyberattacks and compel firms to navigate complex decisions regarding the extent and timing of disclosures.

Preparing for the SEC's Cybersecurity Disclosure Regulations
TechnologyGovernment
Legal.io Newsletter - April 22, 2022

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Legal.io Newsletter - April 22, 2022
Legal OperationsTechnologyIn-House Counsel
A closer look at the legal market

This article examines the legal market and notable trends affecting the legal profession.

A closer look at the legal market
Legal Operations
Legal.io Newsletter - June 18, 2021

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Legal.io Newsletter - June 18, 2021
TechnologyIn-House CounselLegal Software
March 17, 2023 Edition #151

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech

March 17, 2023 Edition #151
Newsletter
EB-5 Gets a Little Less Wild West with FINRA Rule 2111

For the longest time, the EB-5 Program has been running with little clarification and guidance from the multitude of federal and state agencies involved which includes USCIS.

EB-5 Gets a Little Less Wild West with FINRA Rule 2111
Immigration
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments