Law firms are investing thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Still, it might not be enough.
Despite the demand for clear diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in workplaces, law firms are struggling to find and keep DEI executives. A number of failings are thought to contribute, such as pushback from strict conservatives, risk-averse leaders, a lack of recruiting guidance, and vague roles that discourage candidates.
A DEI Framework analysis released by Bloomberg Law with 55 U.S.-based law firms found that at least 80% of the top firms had a full-time senior DEI position. However, many of them struck difficulties in obtaining and retaining these leaders.
One of the primary challenges law firms faced was a lack of role clarity. If chief diversity officer positions aren’t well thought out or lack substance, they can be less desirable to potentially suitable applicants.
Many businesses implementing diversity programs also face backlash from conservative groups, alleging that diversity programs discriminate against white students. Legal activist Edward Blum, founder of the Students for Fair Admissions group, recently won a Supreme Court case against the University of Carolina and Harvard to overturn affirmative action. The decision meant that race-based affirmative action policies would no longer apply to American college admissions.
Such rulings could have implications for chief diversity officers trying to secure diverse talent in law firms. However, despite college admissions policies changing, an American Bar Association report urged law firms to “adopt a holistic evaluation approach that looked beyond GPA and class rank.” This, they said, would enable law firms to contribute to developing a more diverse and innovative workforce in the legal field.
Under-resourcing was proving just as problematic. While a 2022 Minority Corporate Counsel Association survey revealed that the average firm had a budget of over $153,000 for DEI strategies and initiatives, many law firms’ programs are under-resourced. Sometimes, this comes from law firm leaders downplaying inequality and bias, being threatened by organizational changes, and trying to justify or defend the status quo.
To solve DEI chief employment and retention woes, law firms may need to define these roles, create blueprints for success within them, and allocate the necessary resources to ensure they can achieve their diversity, equity, and inclusion goals.
Budget and Compare Pricing Between Legal.io, Law Firms and Other Legal Service Providers
CrowdStrike is facing lawsuits after a major outage disrupted services, potentially causing over $5 billion in losses. However, a limitation of liability clause may protect CrowdStrike from paying significant damages.
Explore the US Copyright Office's new guidance on AI-assisted works, the questions it raises regarding human authorship and AI prompts, and the potential need for court intervention to provide clarification.
The U.S. judiciary is addressing ethical concerns in law clerk hiring, prompted by recent incidents and complaints of bias and favoritism.
She was promoted to GC of The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey after six years of in-house work within the company and several decades legal experience.
The California Supreme Court approved a much-anticipated plan by the state bar to switch to a new licensing exam that will be delivered both remotely and in-person starting in February.
In-house legal professionals discuss whether or not they prefer to be a generalist or specialist in their in-house career.
Under a new law, employers are also prevented from disciplining employees who do not attend these meetings.
Experienced In-house counsel weigh in on the best advice for those taking their first in-house position.