A recent lawsuit filed against Mandell Menkes accuses the firm of violating Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).
In a world where technology is advancing at an unprecedented rate, the ethical and legal implications of biometric data collection are becoming increasingly important. A recent lawsuit filed against a Chicago law firm, Mandell Menkes, brings these concerns to the forefront. The firm is accused of violating Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by allegedly scanning and storing the fingerprints of a former legal secretary, Nancy Gagen.
Nancy Gagen, who worked at Mandell Menkes from 2006 to 2019, filed a complaint on August 18, 2023, in the Cook County Circuit Court. She alleges that the firm unlawfully collected, used, and stored her "personal biometric identifiers and biometric information" without her consent. According to Gagen, the firm installed a Fingertec Biometric device in 2015 and required her to scan her right index finger at the beginning and end of each workday, as well as during her lunch breaks.
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) was enacted in Illinois in 2008 to regulate the collection and storage of biometric data. The law mandates that companies must inform individuals why and for how long their biometric data will be stored. Gagen claims that Mandell Menkes failed to provide this information and never obtained her written consent for the data collection.
The lawsuit emphasizes that this is Gagen's "one and only chance" to seek compensation for the alleged violations. The complaint also warns about the potential future risks of losing control over personal biometric data, stating that the "full ramifications of biometric technology are not fully known."
Gagen is seeking statutory damages, and as of now, neither the counsel for Gagen nor Mandell Menkes have responded to requests for comment.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has taken a pivotal step in advancing data protection standards.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech
Preparations for the exam were put on hold following NCBE allegations of intellectual property infringement.
Cleary Gottlieb announced that it would start naming nonequity partners, following several other top law firms that have started using this classification to retain top associate talent.
With the current uncertain legal landscape, a lot of attorneys and other legal professionals are seeking employment together. Take a look at the several different resources available online to help you pick up your career.
Our in-house professional community their experiences finding and securing an in-house offer.
Multiple Am Law 100 firms, as well as midsize and regional law firms, have de-equitized partners in recent months in what is widely described as “sound financial management of the firm“.
Big Law firms anticipate more work in capital markets and cryptocurrency as the new U.S. administration shifts SEC priorities and eases regulations.