Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

The AI Art Debate: Can Machines Own Copyrights?

In a landmark decision, a Washington, D.C. federal judge has ruled that artwork produced by artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be copyrighted, primarily due to the absence of human authorship.

The AI Art Debate: Can Machines Own Copyrights?

A U.S. court in Washington, D.C. has ruled that a work of art created by AI without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

This pivotal judgment came in response to computer scientist Stephen Thaler's attempt to secure copyright for a piece of art generated by his AI algorithm, the "Creativity Machine." Despite Thaler's multiple attempts to copyright the image as a "work-for-hire" with the Creativity Machine as the author and himself as the owner, the US Copyright Office consistently denied his requests.

Thaler, who also holds the position of president and CEO at Imagination Engines, had initiated a lawsuit against the office in June 2022 after his copyright application for the AI-created artwork "A Recent Entrance to Paradise" was declined. Judge Beryl A. Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia sided with the US Copyright Office, which had previously denied Thaler's copyright registration request.

This decision marks a significant step in defining the legal boundaries surrounding AI-generated artwork, especially given the increasing popularity of AI tools like OpenAI Inc.'s ChatGPT, DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion.

Ryan Abbott, Thaler's attorney, expressed their disagreement with the court's interpretation and revealed intentions to appeal the judgment. Thaler's argument against the Office's decision was that it was "arbitrary, capricious ... and not in accordance with the law." However, Judge Howell's perspective was different. She emphasized that copyright has always necessitated a "guiding human hand" and that "human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright."

This stance isn't new; past cases have shown similar outcomes, such as the famous monkey selfie case. Yet, Judge Howell did recognize the evolving landscape of copyright, especially as artists increasingly use AI as a creative tool. This evolution raises intricate questions about the extent of human involvement required to copyright AI-generated art, especially considering that AI models often draw from pre-existing works.

Historically, courts have consistently refused to grant copyright to creations devoid of human involvement. This includes a range of entities and scenarios, from celestial beings to a monkey's selfie. Judge Howell emphasized that while the world of copyright is evolving with AI's integration into artistic tools, the case at hand was straightforward. Thaler had openly admitted that he had no hand in the artwork's creation, making the decision relatively uncomplicated.

The Copyright Office, on the other hand, believes the court's decision was accurate and is currently reviewing the judgment. The office had recently provided guidance on the copyrightability of AI-assisted works, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing debate on AI authorship. Interestingly, the Copyright Office had approved a limited copyright registration for an AI-assisted graphic novel earlier in February, hinting at potential shifts in the future.

The intersection of AI and copyright is a dynamic space, and the journey has only just begun.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

Lawyers Struggle To Disconnect From Work

A Bloomberg survey highlights the demanding nature of legal work, with lawyers averaging 53-hour weeks and nearly 20% billing over 80 hours in their busiest weeks.

Lawyers Struggle To Disconnect From Work
CareerMental Health
Dollar Tree, Inc. Welcomes Jonathan Leiken as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Jonathan Leiken Joins Dollar Tree, Inc. as Executive VP, Chief Legal Officer: A seasoned legal expert, Leiken brings over 20 years of experience in corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and commercial litigation to fortify Dollar Tree's leadership team.

Dollar Tree, Inc. Welcomes Jonathan Leiken as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
General CounselCareer
Legal.io Newsletter - January 28, 2022

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.

Legal.io Newsletter - January 28, 2022
Legal OperationsTechnologyIn-House Counsel
2024 State of the Corporate Law Department Report

The TR report shows corporate legal depts are focusing on effective advising, operational efficiency, business enablement, and risk management, utilizing tech like Gen AI to enhance legal processes.

2024 State of the Corporate Law Department Report
Career
Southwest Airlines Makes CLO and GC Change in Leadership Reshuffle

Southwest Airlines has announced a restructuring of its legal and governance leadership, initiating a new phase for its in-house team.

Southwest Airlines Makes CLO and GC Change in Leadership Reshuffle
General Counsel
BigLaw Further Increases its Market Share

Large firms saw their share of legal spend increase to 48.2% in 2023, up from 47.9% in 2022, amidst further consolidation at the top.

BigLaw Further Increases its Market Share
Law Firms
Community Perspectives: Inside Counsel - What are outside counsel doing wrong?

In-house legal professionals talk about how they manage in-house vs. outside counsel duties.

Community Perspectives: Inside Counsel - What are outside counsel doing wrong?
In-House Counsel
OKRs + SMART Goals for Law Firms

Goal setting for entrepreneurial law firms and attorneys

OKRs + SMART Goals for Law Firms
Law FirmsCareer
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments