Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Twitter Faces Legal Battle Over $90 Million Fee in Elon Musk Acquisition

Twitter faces a legal showdown over a $90 million fee tied to Elon Musk's $44 billion acquisition. The lawsuit, against law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, centers on claims of 'unjust enrichment' amidst a backdrop of high-stakes corporate disputes and high-profile acquisitions.

Twitter Faces Legal Battle Over $90 Million Fee in Elon Musk Acquisition

Twitter is embroiled in a legal tussle over the hefty fees related to Elon Musk's $44 billion acquisition of the platform. The social media giant's parent company, X Corp., filed a lawsuit against the prominent Wall Street law firm, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. The suit claims a $90 million payment made to the firm was "unjust enrichment" and demands its return.

The lawsuit, lodged in San Francisco Superior Court, alleges that Wachtell Lipton extracted the significant fee "from the company cash register while the keys were being handed over" to Musk, the owner of X Corp. The legal firm was initially hired by Twitter's earlier management when Musk attempted to terminate his acquisition agreement. Despite his efforts, the acquisition was finalized in October of the previous year.

It's worth noting that Twitter has been challenging multiple fees in relation to Musk's acquisition. Earlier, advisory firm Innisfree M&A and PR firm Joele Frank also filed lawsuits against Twitter, claiming unpaid bills and services.

Wachtell Lipton's reputation precedes it, known for advising top-tier deals, including Musk's unsuccessful bid to privatize Tesla in 2018. Their expertise comes at a premium, placing them among the top-earning law firms. This isn't the firm's first brush with legal challenges. They were sued in 2018 by investor Carl Icahn over their involvement in his 2012 takeover bid for CVR Energy, although that suit was eventually dismissed.

The lawsuit's documents highlight that Twitter's leadership approved the $90 million payment, crediting Wachtell Lipton and attorney William Savitt for ensuring Musk honored his acquisition agreement. The suit alleges that this approval was a breach of fiduciary duty by the former Twitter board and executives. They purportedly hurried the deal with Musk without due diligence or adequate information. Shockingly, a large portion of the $90 million fee was transferred to Wachtell Lipton just minutes before the acquisition was sealed. Soon after this, Musk made swift executive changes at Twitter, ousting key players, including the chief legal officer.

While the $90 million fee might seem exorbitant, it's essential to frame it in perspective. When Wachtell was brought on board, Twitter's market valuation was at a $14 billion deficit compared to what Musk had committed to paying. By ensuring Musk's full payment, the law firm effectively boosted Twitter shareholders' value by $14 billion. The contentious fee is roughly 0.6% of this increased value.

The saga underscores the vast sums involved in high-profile acquisitions and the perceived value of elite legal counsel in navigating such deals.

For an engaging and in-depth overview of this latest chapter in the Elon Musk - Twitter sage, see this video by LegalEagle.

 

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

TikTok Vows Legal Battle If U.S. Enforces Ban

A new U.S. law requires ByteDance to divest its U.S. operations, risking a ban if the company refuses. TikTok plans to challenge the law in court.

TikTok Vows Legal Battle If U.S. Enforces Ban
Technology
Tesla Faces Legal Crossroads in Upcoming Autopilot Fatality Trials

Tesla prepares for its first trials involving fatalities allegedly caused by its Autopilot system. The outcomes could have significant implications for the company, Elon Musk, and the broader landscape of autonomous driving technologies.

Tesla Faces Legal Crossroads in Upcoming Autopilot Fatality Trials
FTC Issues Non-Compete Ban Amid Legal Challenges

The FTC has issued a rule banning non-compete clauses, aiming to remove restrictions that prevent employees from switching jobs within an industry.

FTC Issues Non-Compete Ban Amid Legal Challenges
Career
The Sound of Risk: Mapping Keystrokes with Deep Learning and Its Implications for Law Firms

Explore the recent research on deep learning and keystroke mapping, achieving 95% accuracy in translating sounds to letters. This article highlights how this technology unveils new security concerns, focusing on law firms' unique vulnerabilities, including data breaches and cyberattacks on valuable client information.

The Sound of Risk: Mapping Keystrokes with Deep Learning and Its Implications for Law Firms
TechnologyLaw Firms
Don't be Pied Piper - How to Divide Equity Among Startup Founders

One of the first tough decisions facing startup founders is how to allocate equity among the founders, investors, directors, advisors, and employees.

Don't be Pied Piper - How to Divide Equity Among Startup Founders
Business and CorporateSecurities
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments