Explore the US Copyright Office's new guidance on AI-assisted works, the questions it raises regarding human authorship and AI prompts, and the potential need for court intervention to provide clarification.
The US Copyright Office has recently issued new guidance on copyright protections for art, music, and other works created with the help of artificial intelligence. The guidance suggests that AI-assisted works can be registered for copyright if there is significant human authorship, such as when an artist creatively selects, arranges, or modifies AI-generated materials. However, attorneys argue that the guidance leaves room for different interpretations and may require court intervention for clarification.
The policy statement comes after the Copyright Office granted limited copyright registration for an AI-assisted graphic novel, “Zarya of the Dawn” by Kris Kashtanova. While the text and overall work were registered, individual images generated by the text-to-image program Midjourney were not.
The Copyright Office emphasizes that technology can be part of the creative process, citing the use of software like Adobe Photoshop to create copyright-protected works. The key factor is the level of human creative control and the formation of traditional authorship elements in the work.
Ryan Abbott, an IP partner at Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP, suggests that the guidance may be difficult to apply procedurally, as generative AI systems can involve varying levels of human input. The guidance also raises questions about whether AI prompts can qualify for copyright protection, as they may require a certain level of originality and creativity.
While some attorneys argue that the Copyright Office is imitating its approach to computer source code, enforcement of copyright on AI-generated works may prove difficult. The guidance likens AI prompts to instructions given to a commissioned artist, but some lawyers question the distinction between AI-assisted image creation and human photography.
As the legal landscape surrounding AI remains unclear, attorneys are watching for litigation to help clarify the Copyright Office’s guidance. The office has announced that it will hold listening sessions and has launched a new AI webpage to gather public input and feedback.
Reference: https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2023-05321.pdf
Preparations for the exam were put on hold following NCBE allegations of intellectual property infringement.
Legal professionals are becoming increasingly disengaged with their work.
Intellectual property management solutions company Anaqua announced that it plans to be acquired by Nordic Capital, a private equity investor, which will allow it to elevate its technology offerings and widen its clientele.
GPT-4 and Claude 2 both scored above the approximate passing threshold for the MPRE, with GPT-4 even outperforming the average human test-taker.
Troutman Pepper and Locke Lord have agreed to merge, creating a powerhouse firm with over 1,600 lawyers and 35 offices spread across the U.S. and Europe. The merger is set to go live on January 1.
Reveal has acquired Logikcull and IPRO in a a deal valued at over $1B, backed by K1 Investment Management.
Going into business with a partner can be a great way to work. Two heads are often better than one.
The FTC's ban on noncompete agreements is expected to boost competition, innovation, and economic growth. Companies can protect their intellectual property by using patents, copyrights, and trade secrets strategically.
In post-Obama America, many caucasian people assumed racial issues were decidedly behind us. With the recent collective upheaval, this has been proven untrue. In this article, I’ll outline some ideas on how best to prepare a comfortable and safe law firm environment for black professionals.