In-house legal professionals discuss how they perceive years of experience in a law firm vs. in-house, and how they correlate to each other.
(Author) Counsel
Do your “years of experience” reset when you go in-house? I was job-classed based only on my in-house years of experience for compensation at my company.
General Counsel Responses:
They shouldn't reset, assuming your previous experience is in the law and ideally in the speciality/group you're in.
I’d still count my experience, but I’d do so understanding that I have very limited in-house experience. So overall years of experience would be the same, but you’ll still feel like a baby lawyer again in your first in-house role.
It depends on whether you hit a save point or not. If you didn’t, your experience resets but you get to keep all the side quests you’ve already completed.
Counsel Responses:
Sorry to hear that, OP. My experience wasn’t the same. My compensation is based on years of experience which includes private practice and previous in-house work.
Your job is trying to screw you, likely some evil HR drone.
It is a different ball game. You are learning a whole new way to communicate risk. Your years of experience don’t “reset”, but you are green.
Years of experience only reset when you first get barred.
If you didn’t rest at a bonfire, it resets from scratch.
You’d be surprised just how effective you can be when you don’t need to bill by the hour.
Attorney and Associate Responses:
Yes, every lawyer got together and decided that, as a body, they would not consider in-house as years of experience. There are conventions for these sort of things. Individual experience will vary and I certainly don't think being in-house will not give you a great experience.
I went from being a rising mid-level lawyer supervising juniors, to the bottom in terms of seniority, so it feels that way sometimes.
I mean, in-house is more law practice-adjacent than actually practicing law. I wouldn’t count it as years of experience either.
I’ve had friends tell me a few years in private practice is valued (I don’t know what a “few” is, maybe 3–5?). But after that, it doesn’t matter how many law firm years you have. It’s the number of in-house years of experience. I don’t know if this is true but I’ve had a couple friends say this.
In-house? Be a part of the conversation on Fishbowl (anonymous).
Attorneys, judges, and judicial clerks in Illinois may utilize artificial intelligence tools as long as they comply with the rules of professional conduct, the state supreme court announced, issuing a policy dictating the use of such tools.
Opponents say the legislation would violate the First Amendment by allowing the federal government to dictate information and censor protected speech, potentially making the regulatory landscape worse for businesses and consumers.
GCs discuss what types of relationships and networks are vital to maintain both inside and outside their organization.
The new metric for lawyer productivity, RPM, measures attorneys’ relative performance in generating fees and collecting them, compared to their peers.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
In the Law Insider Contract Teardown, Law Insider invites contract experts to dive into the details of notable contracts. We take a look at the most popular episodes.
General Counsels weigh on how they effectively convey legal risks to other departments without causing panic.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
Protesting and disputing government contract awards can appear intimidating at first glance.