In-house legal professionals discuss how they perceive years of experience in a law firm vs. in-house, and how they correlate to each other.
(Author) Counsel
Do your “years of experience” reset when you go in-house? I was job-classed based only on my in-house years of experience for compensation at my company.
General Counsel Responses:
They shouldn't reset, assuming your previous experience is in the law and ideally in the speciality/group you're in.
I’d still count my experience, but I’d do so understanding that I have very limited in-house experience. So overall years of experience would be the same, but you’ll still feel like a baby lawyer again in your first in-house role.
It depends on whether you hit a save point or not. If you didn’t, your experience resets but you get to keep all the side quests you’ve already completed.
Counsel Responses:
Sorry to hear that, OP. My experience wasn’t the same. My compensation is based on years of experience which includes private practice and previous in-house work.
Your job is trying to screw you, likely some evil HR drone.
It is a different ball game. You are learning a whole new way to communicate risk. Your years of experience don’t “reset”, but you are green.
Years of experience only reset when you first get barred.
If you didn’t rest at a bonfire, it resets from scratch.
You’d be surprised just how effective you can be when you don’t need to bill by the hour.
Attorney and Associate Responses:
Yes, every lawyer got together and decided that, as a body, they would not consider in-house as years of experience. There are conventions for these sort of things. Individual experience will vary and I certainly don't think being in-house will not give you a great experience.
I went from being a rising mid-level lawyer supervising juniors, to the bottom in terms of seniority, so it feels that way sometimes.
I mean, in-house is more law practice-adjacent than actually practicing law. I wouldn’t count it as years of experience either.
I’ve had friends tell me a few years in private practice is valued (I don’t know what a “few” is, maybe 3–5?). But after that, it doesn’t matter how many law firm years you have. It’s the number of in-house years of experience. I don’t know if this is true but I’ve had a couple friends say this.
In-house? Be a part of the conversation on Fishbowl (anonymous).
Legal automation company Josef has closed a lightning-fast funding round to capitalize on market response to Josef Q, the AI-powered product it brought out of beta in November 2023 that enables legal and compliance teams to easily create self-service Q&A tools.
The APRA integrates children's privacy into broader consumer privacy programs, requiring companies to obtain affirmative consent for transferring minors' sensitive data.
The legal landscape is undergoing a transformative shift with the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), a powerful tool that is reshaping the role of in-house counsel.
LawCatch Inc., the company behind BriefCatch legal editing software, has successfully raised $3.5 million in an oversubscribed seed round of funding. The lead investor in the funding round was TIA Ventures (www.tiaventures.com), and other notable participants included RiverPark Ventures, C2 Ventures, and Wilson Sonsini Investments Co. This investment round enables TIA Ventures to take a seat on LawCatch's board as well.
An anonymous In-house Fishbowl community member received an offer from a company and then received a counter-offer from their current employer. Here's what the community said.
CNX Resources Corporation Appoints Former Visa Legal Head Timothy S. Bedard as Executive VP & General Counsel
Join our host and CEO, Pieter Gunst, as he explores the career journey of Stacy Lettie, Director of Legal Operations at Adtalem Global Learning.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.