This checklist provides an overview of issues to take into account when preparing a non-‐disclosure agreement. It provides an easy way to ensure that no important issues are overlooked.
Checklist / FAQ
1. Is the agreement unilateral or bilateral, and is this choice appropriate?
Consider who is providing information to whom. If both parties are providing information to the other party, a bilateral (“mutual”) nondisclosure agreement is appropriate. Consider a unilateral agreement when the provision of information is unidirectional.
2. Is it clear who the parties to the agreement are?
Between what entities is the contract being concluded?
Are the names, entity types, addresses and jurisdictions complete and correct?
3. Is the start date of the agreement set?
Verify whether the start date of the agreement is equal to or earlier than the date on which the parties started to exchange information.
4. Is the purpose and context of the agreement explained?
Does the agreement sufficiently describe its purpose? Is it clear in what context information will be exchanged?
5. Is “confidential information” defined?
Is confidential information defined accurately? Does it include a mention of trade secrets? Are the carveouts mentioned in the document present?
6. Are there clear procedures to mark information as confidential?
Is there a requirement to identify in writing whether information is confidential?
Is it clear when information that was conveyed verbally should be considered confidential?
7. Are the necessary exceptions to what encompasses confidential information present?
Ensure that the following are excluded from the definition of confidential information:
8. Does the agreement sufficiently restrict what can be done with confidential information?
Does the agreement sufficiently prohibit the disclosure of confidential information?
Does the agreement prohibit the use of confidential information for any other purpose than the purpose stated in the agreement?
9. Is there a need-‐to-‐know restriction?
Does the agreement state that recipient personnel and contractors will get access on a need-‐to-‐ know basis only?
10. Does the agreement have a clearly defined term during which information is kept confidential?
Typically, confidentiality agreements are concluded for a duration of 5 years. However, you should consider whether the length of the confidentiality period is appropriate for the type of information that is to be kept confidential.
11. Can we terminate the non-‐disclosure agreement?
Does the agreement allow for termination for convenience? If yes, does termination only affect the right to receive and use confidential information, while leaving the confidentiality obligations themselves intact?
12. Does the agreement describe what is expected from the parties in case a breach occurs?
13. Is there a requirement to return or destroy confidential information at the end of the agreement?
Does the agreement describe what needs to be done with confidential information of the other party in case of termination?
Should there be a provision allowing the recipient to retain a copy of the discloser’s confidential information for regulatory or evidentiary purposes?
14. Are intellectual property rights issues sufficiently covered?
Does the agreement mention that each of the parties retain control over their intellectual property rights?
Is there an arrangement for cases in which a party creates derivative works based on the other party’s confidential information?
Should there be a clause prohibiting reverse engineering?
15. Is our liability limited?
Are warranties, disclaimers and limitation of liability addressed? Are indirect damages excluded?
16. Are the following common clauses present in the agreement?
Franklin Graves presented this week to the ABA IP Section on Mastodon and the fediverse. Read below to find out more!
The AI product will eventually become available to all A&O firms worldwide.
Legal Operations professionals discuss avoiding stagnation in their career.
Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech.
Target Corporation and The Estée Lauder Companies have announced the appointments of Amy Tu and Rashida La Lande in their top legal leadership roles
Even as top law firms have reached new revenue and profitability peaks, between 10% and 30% of partners are making less money year to year, as firms focus on retaining top performers.
For Legal.io's GC 101 Webinar, our four panelists detail their first jobs and how they started in the legal industry.
Legal Operations professionals talk about the specific ways they are involved in managing legal operations in a high growth company.
For many foreign students on F-1 visas, the practical American training they receive is just as important as their education.