Legal technology companies are expanding rapidly, as law firms and legal departments deck themselves out with enough computing power to manage a minor space mission. But how can you know if the software you’ve installed is really helping your business? Let’s have a look at some key traits to look out for when evaluating legal technology.
Nice feature – but will anyone use it?
Tech companies will market their new Feature X as creating some brand new highly efficient way to optimize Z. Great – but once it’s in your system, is anyone actually going to use it? IT teams and Operations Managers can often get carried away as they envision an inspiring future of time savings and cost efficiencies. But your lawyers may, unfortunately, be a little less open to change than you are.
Lawyers tend to give attention to giving legal advice, and – in spite of your best efforts – may never quite manage to set aside the time needed to shake old habits. Also, not everyone finds this brave new world of technology enticing. Some of your team may secretly prefer to be working their way through some old-fashioned paper files over clicking through a seemingly-complicated case management system on a screen. Make sure you speak with your team about adopting a new system. And consider whether the software will be put into practice.
Get your measurements done
Every legal tech company tells you their product will cut out time spent on administrative tasks, to ensure your lawyers spend as much time as possible concentrating on what they’re trained to do. But usually they can’t tell you how much time will be saved. Is there a way to measure the efficiencies? If not, the return on investment will be difficult to calculate and you might never be sure whether you’ve saved much at all.
In order to measure the effect of new technology in your organization, you’re going to need a clear idea of what it is you’re actually measuring (preferably something countable, like billable hours), and a baseline to measure it against. That means you should have an idea of, for example, the billable hours everyone in you firm is doing before the technology is introduced, so you can measure the change.
Of course, once you’ve invested in technology, you might think it’s too late to run such tests – which brings me on to my next tip.
Try before you buy
Because you never really know how a new case management system/contract template generator/time recorder/legal tech product of choice is going to work out in practice, it’s always best to insist on a trial period before confirming any expensive changes. Allowing your attorneys to get their work through the software before it's officially in place will allow any red flags to be raised that will warn you whether you’re unwittingly steering your organization into a technological dystopia.
And, of course, this ties into your need for measurements. Measure what you need to before, during and after the trial. By the way, you don’t need the whole company to be involved in a trial – just enough lawyers for you to get a clear picture of what’s going on. Remember that productivity and client demand will fluctuate naturally over a normal year, and these effects will have to be taken into account in your measurements. Done properly, measurements ensure your firm or department is driven by data, as well as dreams!
In-house legal professionals discuss their views on anxiety in their advanced careers.
Several states have enforced legislation that addresses concerns related to misuse of biometric data, but there is still a need for more voice-specific protections to tackle unregulated AI-assisted voice cloning.
Guide to bar association licensing authorities in the United States and abroad.
The results show modest growth in attorney headcounts among the largest U.S. law firms, with significant changes in firm rankings driven by strategic expansions and market dynamics.
In-house legal professionals discuss their views on anxiety in their advanced careers.
LawCatch Inc., the company behind BriefCatch legal editing software, has successfully raised $3.5 million in an oversubscribed seed round of funding. The lead investor in the funding round was TIA Ventures (www.tiaventures.com), and other notable participants included RiverPark Ventures, C2 Ventures, and Wilson Sonsini Investments Co. This investment round enables TIA Ventures to take a seat on LawCatch's board as well.
After 2024, “it’s a whole different world” when it comes to Big Law compensation, as more than one third of Am Law 200 and beyond plan to make changes to their equity partner compensation models, either by stretching the spread or revising compensation criteria.
Stanford Law School appoints George Triantis, a renowned scholar in contracts and business law, as its new dean, succeeding Provost Jenny Martinez.