Explore Legal.io

For Clients
Legal.io company logo
Hire Talent
Find the best fit for any legal role
For Members
Jobs
The best legal jobs, updated daily
Salaries
Benchmark compensation for any legal role
Learn
Learn and grow with our community
Events
Connect with peers at exclusive events
Apps
Tools to streamline legal work
Advertise on Legal.io
Post a job for free
Reach more qualified applicants quickly
Advertise with Us
Reach a targeted audience

For Clients

Hire Talent
Legal.io company logo
Solutions
Find the best fit for any legal role
New Hire
Get highly qualified candidates in days
Popular Roles
Data & Tools
Budget Calculator
Plan and manage your legal budget
Salary Insights
Compensation data for legal roles
Vendor Directory
The ultimate list of legal tech tools

Community Perspectives: Am I crazy to leave biglaw for a 50% pay cut?

Many attorneys end up accepting pay cuts when taking an in-house position. How do they look back on these decisions?

Community Perspectives: Am I crazy to leave biglaw for a 50% pay cut?

A legal professional in the Legal.io In-House Fishbowl asked:

"Am I crazy to leave big law for a ~50% pay cut to take an in-house IP position with a company I’d love to work for? Paid off student loans this past year, so that helps. Would appreciate hearing from anyone who took a similar cut as to whether you regret the decision."

It's well known that many legal professionals end up accepting pay cuts when taking an in-house position. How do they look back on these decisions? Several members of the community responded and shared their experiences. 

An in-house counsel at the director level responded:

"I love my inhouse job but as some others mention, in house is a wide spectrum, some in house jobs sound soul killing and not worth the pay cut to work on uninteresting matters/be viewed as a hated cost center, etc.

But if you’re excited about this actual job and this actual company, that’s good. Don’t expect you’ll be able to come back to biglaw super easily if you’ve been in house a long time, especially if it’s not the type of place that is a biglaw client. But if you hate it and want to switch back in a year or so that’ll probably still be an option.

Can you keep up your current lifestyle with a 50% pay cut ? Will it just be a matter of less savings ? Or will you actually need to make some adjustments ?

Also, not sure how senior you are, but keep in mind the pay reduction is also about all the lockstep raises that you’re no longer going to get. It is what it is, but you may make 50% of comparable biglaw today and only 30% of comparable biglaw in 3 years."

An attorney noted:

Most in-house positions involve a substantial pay cut (despite what the internet would have you believe where everyone finds 350k 9-5 inhouse roles as a 3rd year). 50% is step but not unheard of, particularly depending on the accounting method ones uses (i.e. if you're comparing biglaw base+bonus to just base at in-house job for some reason).

If the role allows for growth, or at least the development of a transferable in-house skill set, I would not be super deterred by the substantial pay decrease as long as you are happy with the compensation you'll be receiving.

Another in-house legal professional noted:

"I went in house straight out of law school, so I can’t speak to taking a pay cut, but I have not regretted that decision once. I have now worked for three different software companies and my pay has increased substantially with each move. In addition, if you get with the right company, there are equity incentives and bonuses that make up for some of the difference in pay with a large firm.

The best part for me is work life balance. I am married and we have three young boys and I take them to school and pick them up everyday. My job is flexible hours and I work from home full time (even pre-COVID). At each job I have had flexible time off, so no accrual for PTO necessary, and other great benefits. I usually work from about 8:30 until 4:30, and we have a great, small team.

Not every situation is the same, but for me going in house right away was the best choice I could have made for my family. Good luck!"

A general counsel shared:

Moving in-house was the best professional decision I’ve ever made. While there will undoubtedly be a pay cut, don’t forget to take into consideration other aspects of corporate compensation package and (at least for me) a significant improvement in work-life balance."

A senior legal counsel wrote:

"More like 25% in my case for a similar move. I probably wouldn’t have done it for 50% but that’s because of my own circumstances. Money is a lot of things, but it’s not everything. If you can still live a satisfying lifestyle and it makes sense for your career, it’s eminently reasonable to take the cut. Keep in mind that generally speaking, the longer you’ve been in house, the more difficult it is to move back to a firm, should you decide to."

--

Many others shared perspectives worth considering for those weighing a similar choice. Check out the in-house Fishbowl (anonymous) or join the Legal.io community for in-house professionals to add your voice to the conversation.

Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments

More from Legal.io

Community Spotlight: Anna Richards, Director of Legal Ops at Micron Technology

Join our host and CEO, Pieter Gunst, as he looks into the career journey of Anna Richards, Director of Legal Operations at Micron.

Community Spotlight: Anna Richards, Director of Legal Ops at Micron Technology
Legal OperationsSpotlight
AI Adoption in Legal Sector Soars, Study Finds

A survey by Clio finds that AI adoption in the legal sector has soared from 19% to 79% in just one year.

Shifting Strategies in Legal Departments: In-House Work Rises as Firm Engagements Decline

There's a growing shift towards insourcing and a strategic reduction in external law firm engagements.

Shifting Strategies in Legal Departments: In-House Work Rises as Firm Engagements Decline
Legal OperationsIn-House CounselCareer
April 7, 2023 Edition #153

Published weekly on Friday, the Legal.io Newsletter covers the latest in legal, talent & tech

April 7, 2023 Edition #153
Newsletter
February Bar Pass Rates Expected to Rise

Early data from the February 2024 bar exam indicates an improvement and a rise in the national mean scaled score, suggesting a stabilization of pass rates after years of decline due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

February Bar Pass Rates Expected to Rise
Career
Lumen Technologies Appoints Chadwick Ho as CLO

Lumen Technologies has appointed Chadwick Ho as the new EVP and CLO, succeeding Stacey Goff after his 26-year tenure.

Lumen Technologies Appoints Chadwick Ho as CLO
CareerGeneral Counsel
Ethical Considerations in the Age of AI: Adapting Legal Practices to Technological Innovation

The legal industry confronts ethical challenges as it integrates generative AI technologies to enhance efficiency and automate workflows.

Ethical Considerations in the Age of AI: Adapting Legal Practices to Technological Innovation
Legal OperationsTechnologyIn-House Counsel
Legal.io Logo
Welcome to Legal.io

Connect with peers, level up your skills, and find jobs at the world's best in-house legal departments